ScaledByDesign/Articles
All ArticlesServicesAbout
scaledbydesign.com
Scaled By Design

Fractional CTO + execution partner for revenue-critical systems.

Company

  • About
  • Services
  • Contact

Resources

  • Articles
  • Pricing
  • FAQ

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 ScaledByDesign. All rights reserved.

contact@scaledbydesign.com

On This Page

The $50k/Month Wake-Up CallStrategy 1: Model TieringStrategy 2: Semantic CachingStrategy 3: Prompt OptimizationStrategy 4: Token Budgets Per FeatureStrategy 5: Batch ProcessingThe Cost Dashboard You NeedThe ResultsStop Burning Money
  1. Articles
  2. AI & Automation
  3. How to Cut Your LLM Costs by 70% Without Losing Quality

How to Cut Your LLM Costs by 70% Without Losing Quality

February 4, 2026·ScaledByDesign·
aillmcost-optimizationproduction

The $50k/Month Wake-Up Call

A client came to us spending $47,000/month on OpenAI API calls. Their AI features were popular — but the unit economics were underwater. Every customer interaction cost $0.12 in inference alone.

Eight weeks later, they were spending $14,000/month with better output quality. Here's exactly how.

Strategy 1: Model Tiering

Not every request needs GPT-4. Most don't.

type ModelTier = "fast" | "standard" | "premium";
 
function selectModel(request: AIRequest): ModelTier {
  // Simple classification, FAQ, routing → fast model
  if (request.complexity === "low" || request.type === "classification") {
    return "fast"; // GPT-4o-mini, Claude Haiku, Gemini Flash
  }
 
  // Standard generation, summarization → mid-tier
  if (request.complexity === "medium") {
    return "standard"; // GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet
  }
 
  // Complex reasoning, code generation, analysis → premium
  return "premium"; // GPT-4.5, Claude Opus, o3
}
 
const MODEL_MAP = {
  fast: { model: "gpt-4o-mini", costPer1kTokens: 0.00015 },
  standard: { model: "gpt-4o", costPer1kTokens: 0.0025 },
  premium: { model: "gpt-4.5-preview", costPer1kTokens: 0.075 },
};

Impact: 60-70% of requests can use the fast tier. That alone cuts costs by 40%.

Strategy 2: Semantic Caching

If someone asks the same question twice, don't call the API twice:

async function cachedInference(prompt: string): Promise<string> {
  // Check semantic cache (not just exact match)
  const embedding = await embed(prompt);
  const cached = await cache.findSimilar(embedding, {
    threshold: 0.95,
    maxAge: "24h",
  });
 
  if (cached) {
    metrics.increment("cache_hit");
    return cached.response;
  }
 
  // Cache miss — call the model
  const response = await llm.generate(prompt);
  await cache.store(embedding, response, { ttl: "24h" });
  metrics.increment("cache_miss");
 
  return response;
}

Impact: 20-40% cache hit rate is typical. Higher for support and FAQ use cases.

Strategy 3: Prompt Optimization

Shorter prompts = fewer tokens = lower cost. But most teams write prompts like novels:

❌ BEFORE (847 tokens):
"You are a helpful customer service assistant for Acme Corp.
Acme Corp was founded in 2019 and sells premium kitchen appliances.
Our values are quality, innovation, and customer satisfaction.
When responding to customers, always be polite, professional, and helpful.
If you don't know the answer, say so honestly.
Always try to resolve the issue in one interaction.
Here is the customer's message: {message}
Please provide a helpful response."
 
✅ AFTER (156 tokens):
"Acme Corp support agent. Kitchen appliances.
Rules: Be concise. Resolve in one reply. Say 'I don't know' when unsure.
Customer: {message}"

Impact: 50-80% reduction in prompt tokens. The model performs the same or better with concise instructions.

Strategy 4: Token Budgets Per Feature

Set hard limits on what each feature can spend:

const TOKEN_BUDGETS = {
  chat_response: { maxInput: 2000, maxOutput: 500 },
  email_draft: { maxInput: 3000, maxOutput: 1000 },
  document_summary: { maxInput: 8000, maxOutput: 500 },
  code_review: { maxInput: 4000, maxOutput: 2000 },
};
 
async function enforceTokenBudget(
  feature: string,
  input: string
): Promise<string> {
  const budget = TOKEN_BUDGETS[feature];
  const inputTokens = countTokens(input);
 
  if (inputTokens > budget.maxInput) {
    // Truncate intelligently, not just cut off
    input = await summarizeToFit(input, budget.maxInput);
  }
 
  return llm.generate(input, { maxTokens: budget.maxOutput });
}

Strategy 5: Batch Processing

Real-time isn't always necessary. Batch what you can:

// Instead of processing each email individually...
// Batch them and process together
 
async function batchClassify(emails: Email[]): Promise<Classification[]> {
  // Group into batches of 20
  const batches = chunk(emails, 20);
 
  return Promise.all(
    batches.map((batch) =>
      llm.generate({
        prompt: `Classify these ${batch.length} emails. Return JSON array.`,
        input: batch.map((e, i) => `[${i}] ${e.subject}: ${e.body}`).join("\n"),
      })
    )
  );
}
// 100 emails: 100 API calls → 5 API calls. Same results.

Impact: 80-95% reduction in API calls for batch-eligible workloads.

The Cost Dashboard You Need

You can't optimize what you don't measure:

MetricTrack Daily
Total spendBy model, by feature
Cost per interactionBy user segment
Cache hit rateTarget > 30%
Token efficiencyOutput quality per dollar
Model tier distribution% fast vs standard vs premium
WasteRequests that generated unused output

The Results

After implementing all five strategies for our client:

MetricBeforeAfter
Monthly spend$47,000$14,000
Avg cost per interaction$0.12$0.03
Response quality (human eval)4.1/54.3/5
P95 latency3.2s1.8s
Cache hit rate0%34%

Quality went up because the tiering system matched the right model to each task, and prompt optimization removed noise that was confusing the models.

Stop Burning Money

Your LLM costs should scale sub-linearly with usage. If they're scaling linearly — or worse, super-linearly — you're leaving money on the table. The five strategies above aren't theoretical. They're what we implement in every AI engagement.

The model is rarely the bottleneck. The engineering around it is.

Previous
The AI Implementation Playbook for Non-Technical Founders
Next
The 90-Day Fractional CTO Checklist
Articles
Your AI Agent Isn't Working Because You Skipped the GuardrailsRAG vs Fine-Tuning: When to Use What in ProductionHow to Cut Your LLM Costs by 70% Without Losing QualityThe AI Implementation Playbook for Non-Technical FoundersWhy Most AI Chatbots Fail (And What Production-Grade Looks Like)Building AI Agents That Know When to Hand Off to HumansVibe Coding Is Destroying Your CodebaseAI Won't Fix Your Broken Data Pipeline